How to get Promoted within (and eventually out of) the Marketing Department

July 8th, 2006 by admin

PromoteThis statement might sound cold and calculated, but I’ll say it anyway.  If you want to get promoted within a large corporation, the last thing you want to do is get so good at your job that the higher ups believe no one else can do it.  As marketers rise through the ranks, they need to show proficiency in all aspects of marketing.  They need to show that they are awesome generalists not specialists.

The age old saying is that a specialist knows more and more about less and less until eventually they know absolutely everything about nothing.  On the other hand a generalist knows less and less about more and more until eventually they know nothing about everything.  The ideal is to err on the side of the generalist.  A chief Marketing Officer needs to know a little about everything in all levels of the organization.

So, back to getting promoted -  Say you are an SEO Marketing Manager and you have a goal of being VP of Marketing for the organization.  During your routine review do not focus on all of your SEO accomplishments.  Don’t get me wrong.  You need to show you are kicking ass in your position, but do not dwell on it.  Instead try to show how your accomplishments relate to other functions in the department.

When talking to superiors within the marketing department keep the conversation high level.  Talk about marketing issues outside of SEO or explain how these issues relate.  Likewise, when talking to superiors from other departments try to show your cross-functional knowledge.

If you do so, you will show that you are able to operate on a high level.  If you don’t, you will be pigeonholed as a SEO Geek and your only promotional opportunity will be to eventual become Director of SEO Marketing.  A powerless title whose only dominion is very land you were trying to escape.

Finding the Ex-Spot in Word of Mouth Advertising

May 9th, 2006 by admin

The current marketing tool du jour is word of mouth advertising, or as Pete Blackshaw calls it Consumer Generated Media (CGM).  Companies long for it, bloggers write about it, marketers talk about it, and a few lucky authors have even gotten rich writing about it.  However, no one has discovered a fail-safe formula for creating a successful word of mouth campaign. 

Logo_only
While far from fail-safe, Pete Blackshaw offers his 2 cents on how to boost your chances in an article he wrote for ClickZ.  The article revolves around two CGM campaigns, a successful one by Pete’s Coffee and Tea and a disastrous one by GM.  You can read the details here.

In the article , Pete identifies the ex-spot.  He writes,

The
ex-spot is that critical moment of experience that makes feedback and
word of mouth slide off your tongue like kids on a waterslide. It is
always well-timed; piggybacks on the great things we love about
products, services, and brands; and is never — I repeat, never –
forced.

A big
reason so many marketers fail in word-of-mouth marketing programs is
they embark on programs well outside the ex-spot. They push messages
that are out of context with the actual customer or brand experience.

Pete suggests four factors that help a word of mouth campaign to be successful

  • In store:
    Plenty of great experiences are nurtured at either the retail location
    or the point of purchase. Imagine the number of shoppers at Target who
    would jump at the opportunity to advertise for the brand while actually
    shopping.
  • At the feedback moment: It’s pretty clear consumer affairs is already an ex-spot for negative advertising, but there’s a huge, untapped opportunity to turn it into a more proactive advertising engine
    for positive testimonials or incremental behavior. There’s clear
    evidence the folks who give direct feedback also sing loudly on blogs
    and message boards. Media planers rarely touch this zone, almost as if
    consumers with megaphones have nothing to do with brand building.
  • On the Web site: Web sites are increasingly an
    extension of brand experience, even in ostensibly low-involvement
    categories like consumer packaged goods. Whether through feedback
    forms, surveys, or well-placed programs, the ex-spot can be readily
    teed up via Web sites.
  • In search: Certain keywords provide clarity as to
    what’s on consumers’ minds or whether they’re actual users of the
    products. These are also good times to tee up such opportunities to
    create favorable CGM. What’s important is the brand use the
    target-ability of search to get consumers quickly to the ex-spot.

The bottom line is that the stars have to be in alignment for CGM to work.  Call it an ex-spot if you want, but for CGM to work the customer has to be in the correct state of mind for it to happen.  Once again a common theme arises.  The customer is the one in control.

Freedom - The Good and Bad

May 8th, 2006 by admin

Today, most people view freedom as an external event.  Take a look at the dictionary definitions.  They are all external:

  1. The condition of being free of restraints.
  2. The capacity to exercise choice; free will: We have the freedom to do as we please all afternoon.
  3. Ease or facility of movement: loose sports clothing, giving the wearer freedom.
  4. A right or the power to engage in certain actions without control or interference:

The Biggest Sin and Organization Can Make

May 6th, 2006 by admin

A few weeks ago, I wrote a piece called Combine and Surrender expousing the need to combine your sales channels and surrender to your customers in order effectively market in today’s atmosphere.

I want to thank the Modern Marketing Blog for cluing me in on a great interview with David Weinberger, author of, Small Pieces Loosely Joined

Alistair Craven, from Management First, asked David,

In embracing the Internet age, what would you say were the biggest sins organizations have committed?

David replied,

Most businesses still think they are the best source of information
about their products.
They still think that they can control their
markets by controlling what information they release. So, they look to
the Internet as a way of doing business as usual, albeit with bits
instead of paper. That’s why most corporate websites are boring,
pointless and offensive.

Customers have figured out that
other customers are the best sources of honest information about
products. Networked markets know more than the companies they’re
talking about. That changes everything, but not enough companies have
caught on.      

The biggest organizational sin remains
insisting that the organization remains in control. That control was
always largely illusory
. Now it gets in the way of the exponential
increases in innovation and customer loyalty that occur when businesses
have the guts to encourage customers and employees to find one another
and talk freely.

Alistair went on to ask,

During your career you have held several marketing roles, and The Wall Street Journal has branded you a marketing guru.  What are the most pertinent challenges confronting today

Neuro Marketing

May 1st, 2006 by admin

It’s nice to see that science is finally catching up to what marketers have instinctively known for years.  A recent post on the Neuro Marketing blog states

The latest edition of Scientific American Mind has an excellent survey of what we know about mirror neurons, A Revealing Reflection.
One of the interesting findings mentioned in the article is that even
sounds can trigger mirror neurons if the sound evokes a specific
action, like tearing a sheet of paper.

Marketers have long know the power of the senses to trigger responses in their subject.  Aromas have been shown to trigger memories that have been latent for twenty years.  Sounds and visual images have similar effects.

What impact does the identification of mirror neurons have Marketers? for one it is important that their not be a disconnect between your marketing messages.  In another post they write,

From a sales and neuromarketing perspective, this research suggest a
basis in neuroscience for the

Combine and Surrender

April 28th, 2006 by admin

Divide and conquer is the wrong mentality when it comes to
branding. Instead think along the lines of combine and
surrender.

The last
thing you want in a brand campaign is a fragmented marketplace.  Figure out how
to connect your marketplaces.  You want them to be talking to one another.  Use
social networking tools such as blogs, forums, and wikis.  It is through conversations between customers that brands are built and take on a life of
their own.

Stop
trying to imprint your brand message onto your audience.  Conquering
through advertising no longer works.  Instead, surrender to the people.
They are the ones that will build it. A brand is an idea in the mind of
the customer. Give your customers an arena to freely develop their
conception of you.

Once you
combine and surrender to your customers you might find out that they have a
more wonderful idea of what your brand should be that you could ever
think up yourself.

Surrendering
creates transparency.  You will no longer have to guess why people choose your
product or service.  Your customers will tell you what aspects of your service
you should concentrate one and which aspects you might need to change or
delete.

Divide
and conquer is old school marketing.  Marketing Segmentation is
dead. 

Combine
and Surrender is the new way.  Fire the marketing department and hire the
customer.

By Drew Hendricks

Seth Godin, Hans-Georg Gadamer, and few words of caution

April 25th, 2006 by admin

Yesterday, I examined the hermeneutic philosophy of Hans-George Gadamer in relation to spreading a brand’s message.  Extrapolating from Gadamer’s writings, I found that for a brand’s message to resonate with a consumer, it must match that person’s conceptual horizon.  Gadamer, not being a business man, used abstract terms such as individuals, understanding, and the fusion of horizons.  Seth Godin, on the other hand, is a business man and restates the same principle nearly 46 years later when he wrote, "Your story has to be grounded in the worldview of your intended audience."

Whether you like Gadamer’s abstract choice of words or Seth Godin’s, the principle remains the same.  The marketer is the one who has to adapt to match the consumer.  The consumer is viewed as an unchanging force that must be adapted to.

This piece of advice, while valuable, has risky implications for the marketer whose task is to develop a long term strategy.  The risk is that the marketer will be too fixated on matching the current world to properly come up with a plan to get consumers from their current worldview A to a worldview B five years down the line.

A  marketing strategist’s task is to not only match the customers current state, but mold the customer and prepare them for a future vision of the world.  How does one do this?

A popular tactic many companies use to accomplish this task is through movie product placements.  Think back at how many movies you have seen that showed actors using fanciful products with actual product names.  The movie script enables the marketers to transport the viewer to a future point in time where that particular world view makes sense.  While watching the movie the viewer has a willing suspension of disbelief and the otherwise disjointed marketing message magically resonates. Years down the linem, when the product does come out, the customer remembers the scene from the movie showing just how useful that product can be. 

If your task is to prepare an audience for a product five years down the line and your company doesn’t have 50 million dollars for movie product placements, then your task is much more difficult.  However, it is not impossible.  What you need to remember is to not fall into trap of simple tailoring or message to current worldviews and expectations.  In the words of Seth Godin your message simply has to be "grounded in the worldview."

Build the seeds of long term strategies into your short
term marketing pieces.  these seeds need to be subtle.  Ideally, customers will not even
notice these seeds until it is time for them to sprout.  When it time for the seed to sprout their message resonates.  This resonation is possible because as the seeds germinated, they subconsciously shaped a future world view that included a demand for your new product.

Marketing and the Fusion of Horizons

April 24th, 2006 by admin

In my last post I talked about how a brand message must be able to leap frog different spheres of conceptual  horizons in order to be successful.  Specifically the message must resonate both with the original niche audience as well as the larger populace.

However, I left out one obvious point.  For a brand message to resonate at all with a customer it must match their horizon.  To the extent the brand horizon and the prospects horizon are in sync is the extent it will be successful.  I just finished watching Seth Godin’s presentation at Google.  He points out that the effectiveness of adwords is that it hits the viewers eyes just when they are thinking about the product.  In this golden moment al la Hans Georg Gadamer there is a fusion of horizons between the viewer and the ad.

Seth Godin, in his latest book latest book, All Marketers are Liars, states that the marketers job is to tell a story.  The most effective stories are those that match-up with the prospect’s world view, or horizon.  A few days ago, Seth summed this point up succinctly by writing in his blog,

The world as it is

Two things marketers do:
1. Do the work necessary to be sure that your perception of the world is similar to the world as it is.
2. Create the stories (and the experiences to back them up) that change the world as it is.

Most marketers fail at #1. By focusing on what they want, or by
having a selfish view of things, they miss the reality of what the
world believes.

And that can cause us to miss #2. Your story has to be grounded in the worldview of your intended audience.

The key point is the last line, "Your story has to be grounded in the worldview of your intended audience."  Otherwise, at the very least, your message will be ignored, or worse misunderstood and considered offensive.

 

Philosophy and Branding

April 24th, 2006 by admin

What can philosophy teach us about marketing?  In one word - Lots.

As an exercise,  I examined the Dialectical Hermeneutics of Hans-Georg Gadamer to see if his theory could shed any light into how brand popularity spans cultures, age groups, and socio-economic strata.  In the end, I came up with a helpful new maxim:  To the extent a brand’s message shares a fusion of horizons with different social groups is the extent that the brand message can effectively travel between them.

Most successful brands such as Starbucks and Netflix started off with a niche group of consumers such as coffee addicts in Seattle and independent film watchers.  Over the years, Starbucks has been able build brand presence to the point now they can move into nearly type of neighborhood and be reasonably certain the store will be successful.  The marketers at Netflix have achieved similar success with its customer base.  The other day, I participated in a Netflix focus group whose members ranged from an 18 year old college student to a 78 year old man who lived in a nursing home.  Netflix brand message resonates positively with each.  The question is Why?

I found an answer in Gadamer’s writings.  Gadamer teaches that to the extent people understand one another is the extent that they share the same conceptual sphere, or fusion of horizons.  At the most primitive level we are all humans and experience the same human emotions.  Geographic distance, cultural values, social mores, and age diffuse this horizon. 

For example, if you placed two culturally isolated people together such as a Kalahari Bushman and a native from one of the outer islands off of  Papa New Guinea.  They would understand each others basic human emotions such as happy, sad, and angry, but little else.  If you placed one person from Europe and one person from the United States together, they would understand a great deal more because of cultural overlap.  Two people from the same country share a greater overlap, same city greater still.  On down the road until you get to coffee addicts in Seattle.

Here is where most marketers make a mistake.  They wrongly assume that since people speak the same language such as English and live in the same location they understand the same things.  The closer two groups appear to be social and culturally similar the more this assumption is made and the more it backfires.

Marketing history is filled with glaring examples of wrong assumptions.  A classic one is the case of the Chevy Nova.  To the branding department in Detroit, the word "Nova" spoke of stars, space and the unknown.  In the Hispanic communities of Southern California the car was mocked as the one that meant "No go" in Spanish.  Although it is an urban legend that sales faltered,  the fact remains that GM would have rather not had the cultural misunderstanding.  (If you want a good laugh take a look at the Chevy Nova Awards).

So, the question remains: How did Starbucks and Netflix, borrowing a phrase from Geoffrey Moore,  cross the chasm of cultural horizons?  The answer is that they centered their marketing messages on ideas or horizons that had a fusion between cultures.  For example,  Starbucks’ success may attributable to many things, but the least of which is its coffee quality. If coffee quality were the focus of Starbucks’ message, then the brand would still be regulated to towns and locations with coffee snobs such as Peet’s Coffee and Tea.  Instead, Starbucks focused on the sensory experience.   The brand flourished because its conceptual framework was based on primitive sensory experience which easily spans cultural horizons.

How did Netflix do it?   Instead of creating a single common transferable horizon, they created a product that had many different benefits and let the cultural niches come to them.  To a immigrant from India, Netflix has the largest selections of Bollywood movies available anywhere.  For the independent film buff, Netflix offers the best recommendations based on her own personal idiosyncratic viewing history.  For the man in the rest home, Netflix represents freedom.  Now he has access to any movie he wants.  He no longer has to wait for a ride to the local rental store.  For the college student, Netflix represents simplicity.

Over the last two years we have seen Apple’s Ipod cross a similar chasm.  How did they do it?  One way was that they chose to make dance the focus of their advertising.  Rather than showing all the great features of the ipod or its ease of use, their advertisements simply showed someone’s silhouette dancing to their favorite tunes.  It is difficult for me to think of a more pure expression of human feeling than dance.  Apple picked a perfect vehicle to cross cultural horizons.

Learn from the examples from Starbucks, Netflix, and Apple.  To effectively expand a brand presence find a fusions of horizons.

If you want to be successful in marketing, don’t get an M.B.A., Or Should you?

April 21st, 2006 by admin

The debate continues on whether or not pursuing an MBA is helpful, or detrimental to a marketing career.  Tim Pollack over at Being Reasonable: The Blog sums up a recent Ad Age article.  Since I cannot access it, I will post his summation:

A consulting firm surveyed 32 consumer-products companies and found that

« Previous Entries

RSS Feed